Sources of Knowledge in Islam: Epistemology of Revelation, Reason, Senses, and Intuition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55849/attasyrih.v11i2.353Keywords:
Revelation, Reason, Senses, IntuitionAbstract
Knowledge in Islam is fundamentally derived from four primary sources: revelation, reason, senses, and intuition. This study is motivated by the fragmented understanding of these sources, which are often treated separately within rational, empirical, and spiritual domains. The research aims to comprehensively analyze the interrelation and integration of these four dimensions in constructing an Islamic epistemology that is holistic and relevant to contemporary intellectual and scientific challenges. Employing a qualitative approach through a library research method, the study examines primary sources such as the Qur’an, hadith, and classical works of Muslim scholars including Al-Farabi, Ibn Sina, Al-Ghazali, and Ibn Arabi, as well as secondary literature consisting of books and peer-reviewed journals published between 2018 and 2025. Data were analyzed using content analysis techniques to identify the contribution of each epistemological source in Islamic thought. The findings indicate that philosophers emphasized reason and empirical observation as rational tools, theologians prioritized revelation as the ultimate and infallible truth, while Sufi scholars valued intuition as a spiritual path to uncover divine reality. Islam harmonizes these perspectives by integrating revelation, reason, senses, and intuition into a unified epistemological system that is rational, empirical, ethical, and spiritual. In conclusion, Islamic epistemology underscores the necessity of harmonizing all sources of knowledge to build an integrated and balanced framework, offering an intellectual foundation capable of addressing moral crises, scientific secularization, and the disintegration of values in the modern era.
References
Adelia. (2024). Epistemology of intuition in Islamic education. Jurnal Pendidikan Integratif, 5(3), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jpi.2024.115
Al-Ghazali. (2000). Tahafut al-Falasifah (The Incoherence of the Philosophers) (A. Maimun, Trans.). Pustaka Hidayah.
Habibirrahim, M., & Misra, M. (2025). Kontribusi Pemikiran Ibnu Sina dan Relevansinya dengan Pendidikan Islam di Era Modern. Jurnal Budi Pekerti Agama Islam, 3(3), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.61132/jbpai.v3i3.1158
Hafizh, M., Dina, S., Astuti, W., & Ningsih, N. W. (2023). Perbandingan Paradigma Epistemologi: Sumber Pengetahuan Perspektif Islam dan Barat. Risalah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam, 9(4), 1496–1509. https://doi.org/10.31943/jurnal_risalah.v9i4.598
Husni, A. S., Harnadi, D., & Nurul, U. (2025). Reason and revelation in Islamic theology. Journal of Pesantren and Diniyah Studies, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jpds.2025.1
Nasution, H. (2019). Falsafat dan mistisisme dalam Islam. UI Press.
Qonita, U., dkk. (2024). Disparitas dan sinergitas epistemologi Filsafat Al-Farabi dan Ibnu Sina. Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial dan Sains, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.19109/intelektualita.v12i1.16173
Rohmah, L. (2013). Pemikiran Ibnu Sina tentang epistemologi: landasan filosofis keilmuan dalam Islam. An-Nur: Jurnal Studi Islam, 5(2), 361–375. Retrieved from https://jurnalannur.ac.id/index.php/An-Nur/article/view/38
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R & D. Alfabeta.
Wijaya, A., & Aksin. (2020). Satu Islam, ragam epistemologi. Diva Press.
Zed, M. (2008). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.





















